The Reliability of Blogs vs Conventional Media: A Response to David Coady

Response to David Coady’s “An Epistemic Defence of the Blogosphere” Preamble/vocab for non-philosophers:  I wrote this for a class so, although I’ve tried to avoid it as much as possible, there are a few technical words which I’ll explain here:Epistemic reliability: A source is epistemically reliable if it produces/conveys more true beliefs than false beliefs. […]

Read More The Reliability of Blogs vs Conventional Media: A Response to David Coady

Gettier Revisited

I’ve talked about Gettier before and much of what I say here will overlap with what I’ve already said.  It turns out I’m much more comfortable lecturing on something if I write about it the night before. Hopefully this won’t always be the case ‘cuz it takes up a lot of time… Why Should You […]

Read More Gettier Revisited

Standard Arguments for Why It’s OK to Eat Meat and Why They Are Much Weaker Than You Think

IntroductionAt some point, every semester in my critical thinking class, I issue a challenge to my students.  For homework, they have to come up with their best possible argument for why it’s OK to eat factory farmed meat.  Every class gives variations of the same handful of arguments and they are indeed the same arguments […]

Read More Standard Arguments for Why It’s OK to Eat Meat and Why They Are Much Weaker Than You Think

Critical Thinking and Vaccine Herd Immunity Part 2: More Vaccinated People Get Measles than Non-Vaccinated

IntroductionWelcome to Part 2 of an investigation of vaccine herd immunity through the concepts of critical thinking.  The purpose of these blog entries is two-fold.  One is to explore the controversy over the legitimacy of herd immunity and the second is to learn central concepts in critical thinking.  Essentially, these posts are an exercise in […]

Read More Critical Thinking and Vaccine Herd Immunity Part 2: More Vaccinated People Get Measles than Non-Vaccinated